Saturday 2 December 2023

Ed McDonald Positively Appraising The Winners Of The Inaugural MAK Halliday Prize

Can I add my congratulations to the authors of the winning book on paralanguage. Although I have not yet got round to reading the book itself — too much interesting stuff coming out at the moment! — I did attend the launch last year at the ACU in North Sydney, where it shared the stage with the book on science teaching co-authored by Len Unsworth and his team. As I remember remarking to my landlady afterwards, the launch itself was one of the first such events I had attended post-lockdown, and it was no fluffy PR exercise but a serious academic session, with (from memory) all of the authors of both books either present or attending via Zoom and talking about their experience in doing the research and writing it up.

Speaking personally, I am delighted to see such products of multidisciplinary team projects getting published. Given the enormous range of relevant knowledge, it is not feasible anymore for one or two authors from the same discipline to cover it all, and it was very clear from the launch of both books how much the participants had benefited from the cross-fertilisation and collegiality that such collaborations encourage.

My congratulations again to the co-authors of the winning book — as well as to the runners up, all of whose books look like must reads — and to the organising committee for carrying through such a worthyand frankly very cheering!project.


Blogger Comments:

[1] To be clear, the authors' model of "paralanguage" is Cléirigh's model of body language, rebranded as their own work. See The Inaugural MAK Halliday Prize Awarded To Cléirigh's Plagiarisers.

[2] To be clear, what the authors talked about was the meetings they had in order to try and understand Cléirigh's very simple model.

[3] To be clear, the model was created by one person, Cléirigh, using just one theory in one discipline, SFL.

Monday 21 August 2023

Robin Fawcett Negatively Judging Hostility

One certainly cannot but agree with Lise in that this environment should not be hostile. I believe that the whole X-Bar thread (opening with your question marks) should have been taken off list right from the start (at the very least).



Blogger Comments:

Here Fawcett is attempting to shift blame from himself to Bateman. For Fawcett's hostility 'in this environment', see his multiple ad hominem attacks on Bateman at:

Robin Fawcett Negatively Judging John Bateman


Although Fawcett can conceal his name, he lacks the self-knowledge to conceal his characteristic brazen hypocrisy. See:

Robin Fawcett Negatively Judging And Negatively Appreciating Halliday And Matthiessen (1999)

Sunday 20 August 2023

Lise Fontaine Negatively Judging Bateman & Robin

I would like to kindly remind you all that this list has hundreds of people on it and exchanges like this are the main reason why people don't like to post questions to the list. These exchanges are not furthering our understanding and if you want to continue your 'display' tactics, maybe do it on your own time. This line of 'argumentation' (whatever) is not helpful to this community. It's easy to just delete messages but the silent majority will simply not feel that they can take part in the community. What is this list for??

I think there was some discussion at an AGM not too long ago about principles of communication within our community. Can we stop and think whether our messages are inclusive, kind, clear, etc?

I know I'm not the moderator any longer but this is really tiring.


Blogger Comments


With regard to Fontaine's one positive judgement, and her own behaviour in this respect, see

Lise Fontaine Personally Attacking Her Paper's Reviewer

Saturday 19 August 2023

Robin Fawcett Negatively Judging John Bateman

I guess keeping your temper in line is mission impossible for you, which probably explains why you resort to your powerful discursive strategies (LOL!), but I will try to reason with you nonetheless

That's typical of people with anger management issuesthey are usually 'not sure' about what they do wrong, even after being told by colleagues that their tone of voice is inappropriate. By the by, that quote above is a textbook example of passive aggressiveness, but I guess you're equally 'not sure' of that. Perhaps there are anger management people in Bremen who can help. …


Blogger Comments:

Although Fawcett can conceal his name, he cannot conceal the tenor of his emails when challenged. Bateman, on the other hand, was unaware that his interlocutor was Fawcett, and had treated him like any other underling who challenged his self-assigned status as primary knower.

Monday 24 April 2023

Christian Matthiessen Positively Appreciating Lise Fontaine's Move Back To Canada

Christian Matthiessen wrote to Lise Fontaine on Sysfling on 31 Mar 2023, at 06:57
Well, your news is mixed — sad for Cardiff U and all of us in the European community; but the good news overwhelms this sense of loss! So warm congratulations,
And also applause to Université de Québec à Trois-Rivières for having made such a brilliant choice! 
This is certainly a very exciting development — for you, but also for the whole SFL community: new possibilities will open up / be opened up by you! You’ll create a new community around you — without losing the vibrant community that you have been part of in Europe. As you say "surely Québec is European right?” — You’ll certainly help build a new trans-Atlantic bridge, create new collaborative opportunities.


Blogger Comments:

Saturday 18 March 2023

David Rose Positively Judging The Acknowledgement Of Sources In Martin (1992)

… So much of this has been worked out or flagged for further work in English Text, which continually acknowledges the work of others who went before it. …






Blogger Comments:


For some of the evidence that flatly contradicts Rose's claim, see:
For evidence that much of the "acknowledgement" of sources, is actually the motivated misrepresentation of sources, see the following posts at English Text: System And Structure:
Misrepresenting Hasan's Work On Speech Function
Misrepresenting Halliday & Hasan On Reference
Misrepresenting Hasan And Confusing Strata And Metafunctions
Misrepresenting Halliday & Hasan
Misrepresenting Halliday On The Stratification Of Content
Misrepresenting Hasan's Work On Cohesion
Misrepresenting Hasan's Cohesive Harmony
Presenting Misunderstandings Of Hasan's Cohesive Harmony As Deficiencies In The Model
Misrepresenting Hasan's Work On Coherence As Formalist
Misrepresenting Cohesive Harmony
Misrepresenting Firth On Context
Misrepresenting Halliday On Formal And Contextual Meaning
Misrepresenting Previous Work On Text Structure And Context
Misrepresenting Hasan On Text Structure
Misrepresenting Barthes
Misrepresenting Barthes And Confusing Material & Semiotic Orders Of Experience
Misinterpreting Pike
Misinterpreting Hasan And Proposing Theoretical Inconsistencies
Misrepresenting Hasan On Generic Structure Potential
Misrepresenting Halliday
Misrepresenting Longacre
Misrepresenting Halliday On Context, Register And Genre
Strategically Misrepresenting Hasan
Misrepresenting Hasan
Misunderstanding Semantic Variation And Bakhtin
Misconstruing Bernstein's Coding Orientation As Ideology