As it is, the posts that have been allegedly produced by a ChatGPT instance are similar to any other racist, sexist, mysogynist, violence-advocating sequence of tokens produced by such devices, and having them placed into the discourse of the list as if they were genuine positions or analyses is similarly unsound in so many ways as to offer a good use case scenario for folks to do projects on.
Blogger Comments:
[1] To be clear, the ChatGPT analyses of Bateman's rhetorical strategies — and those of O'Donnell and Rose — were genuine analyses carried by ChatGPT in response to the prompt:
Please provide a systematic analysis of the rhetorical strategies used in the following text <quoted email>.
CLÉiRIGh did not alter any settings on the ChatGPT to skew any responses. See How My ChatGPT Became Different.
[2] The choices of the words 'racist' and 'mysogynist' are not accidental. They invoke negative judgements of CLÉiRIGh through intertextual reference. See:
- Yaegan Doran Falsely Accusing The Sys-Func Moderator Of Racism
- Mick O'Donnell Falsely Accusing The Sys-Func Moderator Of Misogyny
"As it is, the posts that have been allegedly produced by a ChatGPT instance are similar to any other racist, sexist, mysogynist, violence-advocating sequence of tokens produced by such devices."
- Judgement: Propriety (negative) – Strongly condemns the posts by associating them with socially unacceptable discourse.
"Having them placed into the discourse of the list as if they were genuine positions or analyses is similarly unsound in so many ways as to offer a good use case scenario for folks to do projects on."
- Judgement: Veracity (negative) – Frames the inclusion of the posts as invalid and epistemically flawed.
- Appreciation: Valuation (negative, invoked) – The phrase "as if they were genuine positions or analyses" implies that they lack authenticity or intellectual worth.
No comments:
Post a Comment