My own view is that this omission [of Martin’s discourse semantic systems from IFG by Matthiessen and Halliday]
has as much to do with personal institutional politics within the SFL leadership*,
as it does with the relative merits of the theory.
Appraised
|
Appraisal
|
|
Polarity
|
Attitude
|
|
Matthiessen and Halliday omitting
Martin’s discourse semantic systems from IFG
|
negative
|
judgement: propriety
|
Martin’s discourse semantic theory
|
negative
|
appreciation
|
*I thought we were an autonomous collective:
No comments:
Post a Comment