Indeed, if Michael Halliday and Christian Matthiessen had formed a clear view of the way in which the choices described in their Construing Experience through Meaning determine the choices in the major system networks of the lexicogrammar, they would surely have said so in that book. I have looked hard for a section that makes this connection, but I have yet to find it. This suggests that the model proposed there is simply one possible, half-complete hypothesis that needs to be subject to the normal process in science of development, testing, evaluation, revision (or rejection), retesting, re-evaluation, and so on.
Appraised
|
Appraisal
|
|
Polarity
|
Attitude
|
|
Michæl Halliday And
Christian Matthiessen
|
negative
|
judgement: capacity
|
Construing Experience
Through Meaning
|
negative
|
appreciation: composition
|
On 9/1/12, Robin Fawcett wrote on the Sysfling List:
I would particularly like to support the calls for discussions to avoid being offensive, this being entirely unnecessary. Courtesy costs nothing.
Politeness, n: The most acceptable hypocrisy.
— Ambrose Bierce
Courtesy is only a thin veneer on the general selfishness.
— Honore de Balzac
Manners are the hypocrisy of a nation.
— Honore de Balzac
— Honore de Balzac
Manners are the hypocrisy of a nation.
— Honore de Balzac
Any intelligent person who has studied the book closely knows that it is an intellectual tour de force. So Bertrand Russell's observation is apposite:
A stupid man's report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconsciously translates what he hears into something he can understand.
Mediocre minds usually dismiss anything which reaches
beyond their own understanding.
— Francois de La Rochefoucauld